What angered me the most about the whole article was this excerpt:
'They are unrepentant nationalists, and in the absence of a state, rhetorically and sometimes symbolically, al-Shabab acts as the vanguard and the only reliable guardian of Somali nationalism and identity.'
The second part of the statement is more mind boggling. Halakhe claims that they act as the '..vanguard and the only reliable guardian of Somali nationalism and identity'. al shabaab wouldn't know what the Somali identity is even if it was slapped in the face with it because the Somali identity is something al shabaab has been working hard to eradicate. To say that al shabaab is the only reliable guardian of my identity is migraine inducing. As a Somali, I identify myself with my rich culture. The culture that is compromised of peace, beautiful poetry and music, the importance of Somalinimo and the sexiest guntiino's in Eastern Africa. Do those things sound like aspects of Somalia al shabaab is guarding for us?
Its clear that this writer was ill-advised and probably swayed by a powerful actor to write this piece posted on Al Jazeera English' website. It is hard to believe that a Horn of Africa specialist would be so unknowledgeable on a topic so important. In the future, I would advise Halakhe and all other 'analysts' or 'journalists' who will attempt to write about Somalia to check their facts multiple times. In the long run, as a professional working in East Africa, your loyalty should lie in the good of a nation, not the people who strive to ruin it.